Why Direct/Parametric Modeling Hybrid is an Oxymoron

May 01, 2008 2 min read

Parametric CAD systems are based on a complex internal data-structure that represents each geometrical and dimensional constraint as a relationship among two or more entities. When the end-user requests a change to a parameter (dimension), the CAD system propagates the modification to the entire 3D model (it’s called model evaluation) following those relationships while preserving the validity of each single constraint.

In the data structure of a direct-modeling CAD system there are no constraints. They are created on the fly as a way to support high-level modification of the 3D model. For example, if the CAD system sees a tangency between a planar face and a cylindrical face it likely will assume that it’s a constraint and that it should be preserved to guarantee that the behavior of the system follows the original design intent.

The power and beauty of the direct-modeling approach is that in different moments the set of active constraints can change radically. Constraints “captured” to support modification "A" can even contradict constraints “captured” during modification “B”. This is great because gives the end-user incredible flexibility and power.

On the other hand, in a parametric CAD system the set of constraints can be changed only with tedious and complex operations. The benefit of this more rigid approach is that your CAD system knows all the constraints and doesn’t have to guess them. This makes parametric CAD systems more predictable and reliables. If the 3D parametric model was carefully created by a skilled CAD user this can be a huge advantage.

Because of the intrinsic difference between the two approaches, there cannot be a hybrid CAD system where I can create a parametric part, change it using some of the flexible tools offered by a direct-modeling system, and still have a fully parametric part.  A direct-editing modification to a parametric model is possible, but it becomes a non-return point — the data structure that supports the parametric nature of the model will not survive.

The recent marketing brochures and blogs that are describing a possible future of CAD based on the hybrid approach make me smile. But we all know that marketing knows no limitations…

Franco Folini

Franco Folini
Franco Folini


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.

Also in NOVEDGE Blog

The Art of Mastering V-Ray for SketchUp with a Powerful New Guide
The Art of Mastering V-Ray for SketchUp with a Powerful New Guide

July 09, 2020 3 min read

Learn how to create stunning 3D artwork by gaining knowledge with the most powerful rendering engine out there.
Read More
CYPE, Technical Software for Architecture, Engineering and Construction Hits the American Market-NOVEDGE
CYPE, Technical Software for Architecture, Engineering and Construction Hits the American Market

June 24, 2020 2 min read

CYPE occupies a leading position within the AEC sector, offering a variety of programs that stand out. CYPE is hitting the US market and we couldn't be more excited.
Read More
View and Exchange 3D Data in a Multi-CAD world with CAD Exchanger-NOVEDGE
View and Exchange 3D Data in a Multi-CAD world with CAD Exchanger

June 12, 2020 5 min read

CAD Exchanger helps Engineers (including Product Designers and Software Developers) understanding each other in a multi-CAD world.
Read More

Subscribe