"Great customer service. The folks at Novedge were super helpful in navigating a somewhat complicated order including software upgrades and serial numbers in various stages of inactivity. They were friendly and helpful throughout the process.."
Ruben Ruckmark
"Quick & very helpful. We have been using Novedge for years and are very happy with their quick service when we need to make a purchase and excellent support resolving any issues."
Will Woodson
"Scott is the best. He reminds me about subscriptions dates, guides me in the correct direction for updates. He always responds promptly to me. He is literally the reason I continue to work with Novedge and will do so in the future."
Edward Mchugh
"Calvin Lok is “the man”. After my purchase of Sketchup 2021, he called me and provided step-by-step instructions to ease me through difficulties I was having with the setup of my new software."
Mike Borzage
May 01, 2007 2 min read
Let’s start with the facts.
A few days ago I was working at the data feed for a Google service called Google Base, previously known as Froogle. It’s an online service that allows sellers to upload a list of products with price and description and lets users search online for products to compare prices, shipping fees, and seller ratings.
for Google Base, PayPal is not a syntactically valid option
The new Google Base accepts a feed in a few different formats. One of the most flexible formats available is RSS 2.0, a popular XML format. The accepted payment type is among the optional information sellers can provide for each product. The following is a snippet of the XML code I submitted to Google. I’m confident that you don’t need to be an XML guru to understand this code:
<g:payment_accepted>
MasterCard
</g:payment_accepted>
<g:payment_accepted>
Visa
</g:payment_accepted>
<g:payment_accepted>
PayPal
</g:payment_accepted>
A few hours after the upload I received a notification that the syntax of my XML feed was not valid. Here is the error message I got:
cvc-enumeration-valid:
Value 'PayPal' is not facet-valid
with respect to enumeration
'[Cash, Check, Cheque, Visa, MasterCard,
Discover, AmericanExpress,
WireTransfer, GoogleCheckout]'.
It must be a value from the enumeration.
Translation in plain English: You specify that your online store accepts payment by Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal. For Google Base, PayPal is not a syntactically valid option, while GoogleCheckout is.
Is this just an oversight? Should we blame the omittance of PayPal on a Google programmer who perhaps forgot to include PayPal (Google Checkout's competition) in the list of payment options?
Or is this a poor implementation of the Google motto “Don’t be evil”?
Franco Folini
P.S.: According to this online Google Base Schema (line 419) PayPal is a syntactically valid option for payment, while Google Checkout is not even listed. I guess this is not the Schema used to validate my feed. I would not recommend to check the XML schema if you are not familiar with XML.
August 15, 2024 4 min read
Read MoreAugust 02, 2024 2 min read
Read MoreJuly 30, 2024 3 min read
Read MoreSign up to get the latest on sales, new releases and more …